Review

atomic force microscopy (Keysight Technologies)

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

Keysight Technologies atomic force microscopy
$(A) Atomic Force <t>Microscopy</t> was used on the surface of all repair regions to evaluate critical cartilage tribological measurements, (B) The gECM hydrogel (blue) maintained low frictional coefficient, adhesion levels, and surface roughness compared to microdrilling repair tissue (gray), and the surrounding native tissue (green dashed line). (C) Microindentation was used on the surface of all repair regions to further evaluate mechanics under compression, equilibrium, and the fluid load fraction of the tissue. (D) Compressive modulus and equilibrium modulus were significantly elevated in both treatment groups, compared to native tissue, while fluid load fraction did not significantly differ from native to treatment in either treatment. (p > 0.05, green p-value represents a significant difference of both repair types compared to native cartilage).$
Atomic Force Microscopy, supplied by Keysight Technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/atomic force microscopy/product/Keysight Technologies
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews

atomic force microscopy - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06

86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Flowable Grafts Made from Granular Extracellular Matrix (gECM) Hydrogels Promote Integrative Repair of Articular Cartilage in a Large-Animal Model"

Article Title: Flowable Grafts Made from Granular Extracellular Matrix (gECM) Hydrogels Promote Integrative Repair of Articular Cartilage in a Large-Animal Model

Journal: bioRxiv

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.05.723111

$(A) Atomic Force Microscopy was used on the surface of all repair regions to evaluate critical cartilage tribological measurements, (B) The gECM hydrogel (blue) maintained low frictional coefficient, adhesion levels, and surface roughness compared to microdrilling repair tissue (gray), and the surrounding native tissue (green dashed line). (C) Microindentation was used on the surface of all repair regions to further evaluate mechanics under compression, equilibrium, and the fluid load fraction of the tissue. (D) Compressive modulus and equilibrium modulus were significantly elevated in both treatment groups, compared to native tissue, while fluid load fraction did not significantly differ from native to treatment in either treatment. (p > 0.05, green p-value represents a significant difference of both repair types compared to native cartilage).$
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Atomic Force Microscopy was used on the surface of all repair regions to evaluate critical cartilage tribological measurements, (B) The gECM hydrogel (blue) maintained low frictional coefficient, adhesion levels, and surface roughness compared to microdrilling repair tissue (gray), and the surrounding native tissue (green dashed line). (C) Microindentation was used on the surface of all repair regions to further evaluate mechanics under compression, equilibrium, and the fluid load fraction of the tissue. (D) Compressive modulus and equilibrium modulus were significantly elevated in both treatment groups, compared to native tissue, while fluid load fraction did not significantly differ from native to treatment in either treatment. (p > 0.05, green p-value represents a significant difference of both repair types compared to native cartilage).

Techniques Used: Microscopy

Similar Products

Image Search Results

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Flowable Grafts Made from Granular Extracellular Matrix (gECM) Hydrogels Promote Integrative Repair of Articular Cartilage in a Large-Animal Model

doi: 10.64898/2026.05.05.723111

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Atomic Force Microscopy was used on the surface of all repair regions to evaluate critical cartilage tribological measurements, (B) The gECM hydrogel (blue) maintained low frictional coefficient, adhesion levels, and surface roughness compared to microdrilling repair tissue (gray), and the surrounding native tissue (green dashed line). (C) Microindentation was used on the surface of all repair regions to further evaluate mechanics under compression, equilibrium, and the fluid load fraction of the tissue. (D) Compressive modulus and equilibrium modulus were significantly elevated in both treatment groups, compared to native tissue, while fluid load fraction did not significantly differ from native to treatment in either treatment. (p > 0.05, green p-value represents a significant difference of both repair types compared to native cartilage).

Article Snippet: Surface roughness, frictional coefficient, adhesion, compressive modulus, and topographical structures were measured using atomic force microscopy (Keysight 5500 AFM, Keysight Technologies Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, USA).

Techniques: Microscopy